LLM interaction layer
Test prompt injection and jailbreaks with single-turn and multi-turn attacks. You can also add your own tests.
We red-team the AI system you have built, across the layers in scope: model interactions, retrieval, tools, and dependencies. You get clear evidence, recommended fixes, and OWASP mapping.
Free scan at launch · Clear scope · No spam

See how a test moves from a live attack to a clear report.
Teams are adding LLMs, search, and agents to their products. Few have tested how those systems behave under attack.
Prompt injection, jailbreaks, poisoned documents, and tool misuse are not covered by the security tools most teams already use.
Many standard attacks no longer work on hardened models. The useful work is finding the ones that still do.
The pipeline
AI systems have more than one point of risk. We test more than the chat box. The LLM layer is available now. Other layers are planned.
Test prompt injection and jailbreaks with single-turn and multi-turn attacks. You can also add your own tests.
Test whether a poisoned document in your own knowledge base can influence the model. Other retrieval tests are still planned and will be marked clearly in the report.
Test whether an agent can be pushed into misusing tools or taking actions it should not. Mapped to the OWASP Agentic Top 10.
Check model files and dependencies for unsafe formats, embedded code, and unknown origins.
We check which attack types are relevant before testing. We skip outdated tests and record what we left out.
We review the target, choose the tests, and lock the plan before the run starts.
Your report includes the main risks, technical evidence, recommended fixes, and the tests we did not run.
The approach
We run AI security audits today. The waitlist is for early access as the product becomes available.
Agree on access
Analyze the target
Run the tests
Deliver the report
Compliance
We use OWASP as the main security baseline. We also map findings to relevant guidance for the EU, US, and India.
A widely used security checklist for LLM apps. We map each finding to the relevant OWASP category, including prompt injection, sensitive-data disclosure, and system-prompt leakage.
For agent and tool testing, findings map to the OWASP Agentic Top 10, including tool misuse, excessive agency, and privilege escalation.
Robustness & accuracy obligations for high-risk systems
Govern · Map · Measure · Manage
§8 security-safeguards duty, DPIA-ready
Compliance mapping is guidance, not legal advice. Review it with qualified counsel.
You only pay for tests that are available. Anything still in development is waitlist-only.
Start with the basics.
Run another scan when things change.
One report for every available layer.
More layers are on the way.
Every report states exactly which modules ran. A scan is technical evidence for your risk assessment. It is not a certification, and it is not a guarantee of compliance.
Join for early access. Tell us what you need tested so we can prioritise the right work.
No spam · Unsubscribe anytime · Access updates only